The Cydonia Institute
Through NASA’s own photographs the truth will be revealed
The Cydonia Institute                                                          Vol. 10   No. 1 
The HiRISE Face
by George J. Haas
September 2007 (Revised 2011)
 
 
 
 
 
   The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) launched successfully from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station on August 12, 2005 on its seven-month voyage to the Red Planet. The orbiter carries a new High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment camera, known as HiRISE. This new camera has the capability of photographing the surface of Mars in unprecedented detail, allowing researchers and the public to view objects as small as one meter. Although the HiRISE camera commenced its mapping orbit around Mars on September 29, 2006, we wouldn’t get a look at the first full resolution portrait of the Cydonia Face until the following year.

   On April 11, 2007 the University of Arizona Team posted the first MRO HiRISE image of the Face on their public web site. The image was aptly titled “Popular Landform in Cydonia Region” (Figure 1). Unlike previously released image files like those of the Mars Global Surveyor, which offer Tif, Gif, Jpeg and raw versions of each image, the full HiRISE strip is so large, weighing in at 300 MB, that you must upload a special imaging program called JPEG2000 just to view the raw data. Contrary to NASA’s commitment of easy access, there is nothing user friendly about this new high-tech format. The image provided for most viewers to see is just a small crop of a larger image that shows the Face in a very dark light (Figure 1).


 
Figure 1
The HiRISE Cydonia Face (2007)
(PSP_003234_2210)
Credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona

Due to the darkness of the University of Arizona release I processed the image and lightened the contrast to reveal additional detail, most notably the eastern feline side (Figure 2).


 
 
Figure 2
The HiRISE Cydonia Face (2007)
(PSP_003234_2210)
Contrast adjustment by The Cydonia Institute 
Credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona/The Cydonia Institute

Two days after its release a member of the University of Arizona team, Richard Leis posted his personal thoughts about the new image on the official HiRISE Team Blog.1 After belying the “pseudo-science” of the Art Bell crowd and calling Richard Hoagland a charlatan, Leis made the following remarks about the Cydonia Face: 

“This then is the real face of Mars, a boulder-strewn mesa carved not by
imaginary entities but by the slow yet steady erosion caused by winds, impacts,
physical failure of rocks, and perhaps temperature variations.”2

Keep in mind, that this is the mind-set of an “Operations Specialist” at the University of Arizona. An official - in charge of what we see from the MRO and one of the people in control of how it is presented.

   Then sometime during the summer college break, the University of Arizona Team quietly replaced their original full-faced image of the Cydonia Face with a new “raw” version that was not only cropped at the edges but also inverted (Figure 3). Although the inverted orientation of the new image is not acknowledged in the available caption for the image, if one bothers to read on – down into the second paragraph of the provided text, one would finally realize that the image was indeed presented up-side down with North pointing down.


 
 
Figure 3
UA revised presentation of the HiRISE Cydonia Face
(cropped and inverted “raw” version).
(PSP_003234_2210)
Credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona

   After an extensive e-mail inquiry; the reasons given for why the current image was posted up-side down was due to the fact that the picture was not processed and was released in its raw format that has an inverted orientation, which is caused by a combination of the push-broom imager and the South to North polar orbit of the HiRISE camera.3 In short, all raw images are unprocessed and inverted. This explanation was interesting, considering every other HiRISE image posted on the Arizona University web site are processed and presented with North up. For some reason it appears that the researchers at Arizona University thought it was better to view the Cydonia Face in the “raw” with a reversed orientation – with North down.

   I see no reason to present an inverted image of the Cydonia Face, other than to confuse the public and obfuscate its facial features. Figure 4 shows the same “raw” image with the orientation corrected.


 
 
Figure 4
The HiRISE Cydonia Face orientation corrected
(cropped and inverted “raw” version)
(PSP_003234_2210)
Credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona

   As a result of downloading and examining this enormous MRO HiRISE photograph of the Cydonia Face we became confident that this new image supported all of the bifurcated facial aspects we have previously identified. To document the constancy of these facial features we will begin our review with the western humanoid side of the current HiRISE image of the Cydonia Face
(Figure 5).



 
 
Figure 5
Humanoid side of the HiRISE Cydonia Face (duplicated perspective with analytical drawing)
(PSP-003234-2210 - 2007)
Analytical drawing by George J. Haas (2011)
Image courtesy The Cydonia Institute

   Starting with the overall rectangular shape of the formation, notice the flanged headdress that frames the image and the tri-leaf insignia that appears at the center of the forehead. This is the exact diagnostic feature that directed our original investigation towards Mesoamerican iconography. This tri-leaf insignia depicts a sprouting maize seed, which was utilized as a symbol of kingship among the Maya and Olmec.4 The facial features include an almond-shaped eye, a brow with a deer effigy and the famous “tear-drop” feature placed on the cheek. Also present are the elaborate nose and mouth ornaments that adorn the face.

   Turning our attention to the feline side of the Face (Figure 6), we are able to see the crowned headdress and the rectangular, squinting eye. The new image also provides further evidence of the zigzag-shaped beard (or mane), a mouth, fang and flailing tongue. Again all of these facial features observed on the feline side maintain their sculpted integrity and are shown to be permanent formations that are consistent throughout the previous collection of the over 20 images that either NASA or the ESA has taken of the Face on Mars.


 

 
 
Figure 6
Feline side of the HiRISE Cydonia Face (duplicated perspective with analytical drawing)
(PSP-003234-2210 - 2007)
Analytical drawing George J. Haas (2011)
Image courtesy The Cydonia Institute

   While the highly reflective western side of the Cydonia Face appears relatively cohesive, the eastern side of the structure appears fragmented with a distinct linear quality. These lines and cracks project a compartmentalized design often seen in jade masks produced by the Maya. The composite jade feline mask in figure 7 demonstrates the puzzle-like aspect of these composite faces. Notice the crowned forehead, the rectangular-shaped eye sockets, the muzzle, mane, and flailing tongue. These same compartmentalized features are also seen on the feline side of the Cydonia Face (Figure 7).


 

 
 
Figure 7
Comparison with compartmentalized jade mask

Left: Jaguar - jade composite mask (Maya)
(Image source: Justin Kerr Photo K 7811)

Right: Feline side of the HiRISE Cydonia Face (duplicated perspective)
Image courtesy The Cydonia Institute
(Notated by William R. Saunders)

   Of all the facial features, it is the eyes of both the eastern and western sides of the Cydonia Face that have caused constant debate. The main reason for this dispute is that the eyes don’t match. After the release of the 2001 MGS narrow swath (M16-00184) that photographed a portion of the Face at 1.7 meters (or 5.6 feet per pixel), which verified the eye formation as structurally identical to a human eye, the research community has patiently awaited a comparable image of the eastern feline eye. At last the MRO HiRISE camera provided us with just such an image.

   To begin, when the 2001 M16-00184 image of the western humanoid eye is compared to the current MRO HiRISE version of the same area, the almond-shaped eye maintains all its human form (Figure 8).  Notice the projecting edge of the "brow," the almond-shaped eye socket and lid creases that meet at the medial canthus. The pronounced orbit of the eyeball also includes an "iris."  Both images document that the eye has actual structure as opposed to a chance projection.


 
 
Figure 8
Eye formation comparison – western humanoid side of the Cydonia Face

Left: MOC eye formation - Humanoid side of the Cydonia Face (2001)
(M16-00184)
Image Courtesy Keith Laney

Right: MRO HiRISE eye formation - Humanoid side of the Cydonia Face (2007)
(PSP-003234-2210)
Image Courtesy Keith Laney

Looking at the eastern feline eye, we see an empty rectangular, organic form. One can’t help but notice that this eye formation is not carved as a human, almond-shaped eye (Figure 9). The feline eye form takes the shape of a serpent head with a flailing tongue.


 
 
Figure 9
Serpentine eye formation - feline side of the HiRISE Cydonia Face
(PSP-003234-2210)
Image Courtesy The Cydonia Institute
 
Analytical drawing by George J. Haas

   The over all shape of the feline’s serpentine eye conforms to the flaming eye form form often seen in the were-jaguar masks produced by the Olmec of Mesoamerica5 (Figure 10). 


 
 
Figure 10
Olmec were-jaguar with flaming eyebrow (stone)
Image Source: American Museum of Natural History

When the overall shape of the were-jaguar’s flaming eye is compared to the eastern eye formation on the feline side of the Cydonia Face, a common serpentine motif appears quite plausible (Figure 11). 


 
 
Figure 11
Were-jaguar eye comparisons

Left: Eastern feline eye of the HiRISE Cydonia Face (detail)
 Image Courtesy The Cydonia Institute

Right: Olmec were-jaguar flaming eyebrow  (detail)
Image Source: American Museum of Natural History


   As a result of this new evidence provided by the MRO HiRISE camera, in regards to the viability of both the eastern and western facial formations observed on the Cydonia Face, it is now beyond any reasonable doubt that the Face on Mars is an artificially produced edifice that demonstrates a common iconography and bifurcated design – uniquely produced throughout cultures of Mesoamerica.


Footnotes:

  1. Richard Leis is a thirty three year old Operations Specialist (Downlink) - The Downlink team runs automated processes to download the HiRISE camera raw image products to the Operations Center. They clean them up and stitch them together into nice mosaics, prior to releasing them to the scientific community and public. His daily tasks include: making sure the software is running correctly, validating the images, testing changes to the processes and new software, keeping the procedures up to date, writing scripts, and attending meetings. Also note the name “Richard Leis” is not a reference to Richard Hoagland being a liar.  http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/HiBlog/?author=3
  2.  Richard Leis, HiRISE Blog, Face, (Friday April, 13).  http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/HiBlog/.
  3. Personal e-mail communication between George J. Haas with HiRISE Team member Joe Plassmann on 8/30/2007.
  4. David Freidel, Linda Schele,and Joy Parker, Maya Cosmos: Three Thousand Years on the Shaman’s Path (New York: Quill, 1993), 431.
  5. The term were-jaguar refers to facial features often seen in Olmec iconography that combines human and feline aspects. The most distinguishing design characteristic is the mouth, which displays a wide flaring upper lip that is turned down at the corners. 
 
 

Become a member of The Cydonia Institute’s Discussion Board and join in on the discussion with fellow members.

  The Cydonia Institute Discussion board